James Bond's 70th birthday brings some important background on how Daniel Craig was cast.
April 13th, 1953 saw the first printing of Ian Fleming’s Casino Royale introduce the world at large to the mythology that would lead to the James Bond movies. 007’s first literary mission saw him beaten and bruised, but ready to start a legacy that continues, both in print and on the big screen, 70 years later. Casting this iconic role is as difficult now as it was back in the day, a fact that the franchise’s long time casting director has proven again when explaining why hopefuls like Henry Cavill and Sam Heughan didn’t make the cut for the 2006 soft reboot.
In an interview with RadioTimes, casting director Debbie McWilliams got to go deeper into the process that kicked off the story of Daniel Craig's James Bond. With eight actors screen tested for Casino Royale, there was a range of candidates that did include Cavill and Heughan. But when it came to casting the lead to softly reboot the Bond continuity, the approach to the character informed McWilliams and her team in the following manner: When we started, it was a slightly different feel. We did look at a lot of younger actors. and I just don't think they had the gravitas, they didn't have the experience, they didn't have the mental capacity to take it on, because it's not just the part they're taking on, it's a massive responsibility. So we kind of scrubbed that idea and went back to the drawing board and started again.
Those sentiments definitely align with those of Casino Royale director Martin Campbell, who previously told CinemaBlend that Cavill’s youthful inexperience was the reason he didn’t land the role in the end. The same could be said for Sam Heughan, as the Outlander star’s Casino Royale audition also saw him losing out on the lead role of this very franchise. Admittedly, Heughan admitted that he wasn’t ready for the role at that time, further backing both Campbell and McWiliams’ commentary on the matter.
0 Comments